Middle East Respiratory Syndrome– advancing the public health and research agenda on MERS- lessons from the South Korea outbreak
The weekly epidemiological record of the World Health Organisation 15th May 20151
states that ‘the cases of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)
recently exported to other countries have not resulted in sustained
onward transmission to persons in close contact with these cases on
aircraft or in the respective countries outside the Middle East.’ This
situation has changed rapidly and remarkably. Five days after the
publication of this report, the first case of a MERS-coronavirus
(MERS-CoV) infection in Seoul, South Korea was reported on 20 May 20152.
This patient had a history of recent travel to the Middle East. Over
the ensuing three weeks, the number of secondary, tertiary and perhaps
quaternary cases of MERS from this single patient rose rapidly and has
become the largest case cluster of MERS occurring outside the Middle
East. The Korean outbreak appears from the available data to be
attributable to poor infection control measures, although the hospital
air-conditioning system's lack of ventilators may have resulted in the
rapid extensive spread of MERS among patients and staff3. Furthermore, MERS-CoV was detected in bathrooms and on doorknobs indicating ineffective disinfection procedures.
As of June 9th 2015, there have been 95 cases (with 7 deaths) of MERS-CoV infection associated with the South Korean outbreak3.
Over two thirds of all confirmed cases have been reported from St.
Mary's Hospital, a 400 bed facility in Gyeonggi Province, Seoul and at
least 14 facilities have reported MERS cases during the outbreak. This
unusually large number of secondary (80 cases) and tertiary (14 cases)
associated with an imported case of MERS by a traveller is a significant
development (as per 11th June 2015). Furthermore, whilst the Korea
outbreak has focussed global attention, a nosocomial outbreak of MERS in
Hufoof, Saudi Arabia has been on going since 20 Apr 2015 and resulted
in 26 cases over the past 3 weeks4.
There continue to be MERS cases reported from Jeddah and Riyadh, which
are “sporadic” community cases. To date Saudi Arabia has reported 1026
MERS cases including 450 deaths (44 percent) since the first MERS case
was reported in September, 2012.
The South Korean and Hufoof outbreaks raise several important concerns:
- First the Korean outbreak emphasizes that MERS-CoV remains a major threat to global health security and could have epidemic potential with time, even in the absence of virus mutation.
- Second the nature of the virus and its evolution into a more virulent form continues to need close monitoring. Genomic sequencing studies of MERS-CoV obtained from the first Korean case published by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention5 has shown homology with MERS-CoV strains originating from Saudi Arabia. Whilst no significant variation has been identified it remains crucial that genomic studies for as many MERS cases as possible are performed.
- Third, up to a million pilgrims from over 182 countries will travel to Mecca, Saudi Arabia for the Ramadan period which begins on June 18th 2015 and the threat of further global spread remains.
- Fourth, for the past 18 months, MERS and other global infectious diseases threats were totally overshadowed by the Ebola virus disease epidemic6, highlighting the inadequacies of global surveillance systems to focus concurrently on several emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases simultaneously.
- Fifth, many basic questions about the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of MERS-CoV remain to be answered8.
- Sixth, it's been 3 years since MERS was identified as a lethal new viral respiratory infection of humans9 and primary cases of MERS-CoV infection continue to occur throughout the year7 in the Middle East. The South Korean outbreak now illustrates the need to enhance MERS-CoV surveillance systems, and heightens global awareness of MERS and the importance of infection control measures.
- Finally, the Korean outbreak emphasizes the importance of individuals, especially healthcare workers, recognizing that they may have been exposed to MERS patients and seeking medical care and self-quarantining at an early time during the disease course.
Moving
forward, it is critical that global efforts are focussed urgently on
the basic science and on clinical and public health research so that the
exact mode of transmission to and between humans, and new drugs and
other therapeutic interventions and vaccines can be developed6, 7.
Two coronaviruses, SARS-CoV and now MERS-CoV, which cause severe
respiratory disease with high mortality rates emerged within the past
two decades10,
reinforcing the need for clinically efficacious antivirals targeting
coronaviruses. Lessons learnt from the recent Ebola Virus Disease could
also be applied to MERS11.
Whilst MERS does not yet constitute an International Public Health
Emergency the Korean outbreak is an extraordinary event. Previous
estimates of the epidemic potential of MERS-CoV have not found that it
had pandemic potential12,
suggesting that airborne, human-to-human transmission is rare, but the
present outbreak indicates that simple hygiene is important, especially
in health care facilities. The index patient arrived at a health care
system that was able to identify MERS as a risk given his travel
itinerary and had the laboratory resources to rapidly identify the
virus.
With continuing spread of MERS-CoV to countries
outside the Middle East and to all continents, MERS remains a public
health risk and possible consequences of further international spread
could be serious in view of the patterns of nosocomial transmission
within healthcare facilities. Further spread to countries with weak
health systems and laboratory facilities unable to rapidly identify an
unexpected virus may result in a widespread outbreak or an epidemic in
many of the 182 countries from which Ramadan, Hajj and Umrah pilgrims
originate.
References
- Embarek, P.K. and Kerkhove, V. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) –current situation 3 years after the virus was first identified. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015 May 15; 90: 245–250
- WHO. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)— Republic of Korea. Disease outbreak news May 30. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. http://www.who.int/csr/don/01-june-2015-merskorea/en/ (accessed June 2, 2015).
- Source: Korean MOH press release 9 Jun 2015 [trans. Korean subscribers, edited] http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=1&CONT_SEQ=323205.
- WHO Report: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) – Saudi Arabia-Disease outbreak news http://www.who.int/csr/don/04-june-2015-mers-saudi-arabia/en/.
- PRO/AH/EDR> MERS-CoV (57): South Korea, Saudi Arabia, viral sequencing, WHO. ProMED 6 June 2015.
- Zumla, A., Perlman, S., McNabb, S.J., Shaikh, A., Heymann, D.L., McCloskey, B. et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome in the shadow of Ebola. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Feb; 3: 100–102
- Zumla, A., Hui, D., and Perlman, S. Middle East respiratory Syndrome. Lancet. 2015; (in press)
- Hui, D.S. and Zumla, A. Advancing priority research on the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 15; 209: 173–176
- Zaki, A.M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T.M. et al. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1814–1820
- Hui, D.S., Memish, Z.A., and Zumla, A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome vs. the Middle East respiratory syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014 May; 20: 233–241 (do)
- Heymann, D.L., Chen, L., Takemi, K., Fidler, D.P., Tappero, J.W., Thomas, M.J. et al. Global health security: the wider lessons from the west African Ebola virus disease epidemic. Lancet. 2015 May 9; 385: 1884–1901DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60858-3
- Bauch, C.T. and Oraby, T. Assessing the pandemic potential of MERS-CoV. Lancet. 2013 Aug 24; 382: 662–664DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61504-4 (Epub 2013 Jul 5)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar